UNIVERSAL SUFFERING UNITS

Universal Suffering Units (USU)

USU is a calibrated, additive unit of experienced suffering. It scales with intensity, duration, and the number of people affected, so that burden can be aggregated across people, places, and time.

The unit is anchored so that a familiar trajectory — renal colic (kidney‑stone pain) — equals 1.0 USU, and can be reported with uncertainty intervals and simple sensitivity checks.

Templates and worked CSVs are available as the Supplementary File on the preprint page.

USU in one minute

At its core, USU aggregates intensity × time with a modest convexity:

  • Each experience is rated on a 0–10 intensity scale (e.g., from mild discomfort to the worst pain imaginable).
  • Intensities can be transformed with an exponent p ≥ 1 to modestly up‑weight high‑intensity states.
  • The unit is calibrated so that a reference trajectory of renal colic (kidney‑stone pain) equals 1.0 USU.
  • A simple anchor ladder links the unit to everyday experiences: roughly needle prick (~0.001 USU), paper cut / stubbed toe (~0.01), fingertip burn (~0.1), and renal colic (kidney‑stone pain, 1.0 USU).
  • Within a person‑day, overlapping harms are combined with a simple overlap rule (strongest state counts most, additional states count less).
  • We recommend reporting medians with 90% uncertainty intervals from Monte Carlo simulations rather than single point estimates.

How USU fits with existing metrics

USU is designed to sit alongside, not replace, established frameworks:

  • DALY (Disability‑Adjusted Life Year) measures years of healthy life lost to illness or early death.
  • QALY (Quality‑Adjusted Life Year) measures years of life, weighted by their health‑related quality.
  • USU instead quantifies the experienced burden itself on a calibrated scale.
  • In practice, USU is most informative when shown alongside DALY/QALY and routine operational indicators (cases, beds, displacement, costs).

A quick example

In the USU preprint, we apply the unit to two real but stylized cases in Brazil:

  • Dengue in 2024 (epidemiological weeks 1–23), where millions of non‑severe cases, plus a small number of severe ones, generate tens of millions of USU.
  • Flood‑related displacement in Rio Grande do Sul, where a smaller population experiences longer, disruptive episodes of housing loss and disruption.

Despite being very different kinds of harm, the two examples end up in the same order of magnitude in USU. This illustrates the core idea: USU lets us put large numbers of moderate episodes and smaller numbers of intense, longer episodes on a common experiential scale, while staying anchored to a familiar reference (kidney‑stone pain = 1.0 USU).

Paper & data

The formal definition, calibration procedure, worked examples, and ethical guardrails are described in the methods preprint:

Denis Mikhaylov. Universal Suffering Units (USU): A calibrated additive unit of experienced suffering. Preprints.org, 2025. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202511.1315.v1.

The same page hosts the Supplementary File (anchors, calibration summary, minimal template, and all CSVs used in the examples), so that others can replicate and adapt the calculations.

FAQ (USU basics)

1. What is a Universal Suffering Unit (USU)?

A Universal Suffering Unit (USU) is a calibrated measure of experienced suffering. It scales with how intense an experience feels, how long it lasts, and how many people are affected.

Formally, USU aggregates intensity‑over‑time curves on a 0–10 scale, with a modest non‑linearity so that very intense states count more per unit time than mild ones. The unit is anchored so that a typical episode of renal colic (kidney‑stone pain) over its full trajectory is defined as 1.0 USU.

2. How is USU anchored to real experiences?

To keep USU intuitive, we use a small ladder of everyday anchors:

  • 0.001 USU – a brief needle stick for a blood draw.
  • 0.01 USU – a paper cut or stubbed toe.
  • 0.1 USU – a second‑degree burn on a fingertip with a few hours of throbbing.
  • 1.0 USU – a typical renal colic (kidney‑stone) episode over its full course.

Other states are placed on the same ladder by panels of people familiar with those states (including, where possible, people with lived experience). The aim is not perfect precision, but a shared, explainable reference scale.

3. How does USU treat very intense versus mild suffering?

USU uses an exponent p (with p ≥ 1) on the intensity scale. When p > 1, holding time constant, very intense experiences contribute more USU than proportionally milder ones.

Intuitively, this reflects the idea that increasing pain from 8/10 to 9/10 is “worse” than increasing from 1/10 to 2/10, even though both changes are +1 on the numeric scale. The exponent is documented and can be changed by other researchers in their own applications if they prefer a different curvature.

4. How would I use USU in my own work or dataset?

The basic recipe is:

  • Define the states you care about (e.g., mild dengue, long‑term displacement, moderate depression).
  • Assign intensity bands on the 0–10 scale for a typical day in each state, using the anchor ladder (needle, cut, burn, kidney stone) as reference.
  • Specify duration patterns (how many days or months, and whether intensity is constant or changes over time).
  • Multiply by population – for each state, combine intensity, duration, and the number of people affected.

Templates and example CSV files in the preprint supplement show how to implement this in practice (including Monte‑Carlo uncertainty). USU is designed so other groups can plug in their own assumptions and recompute totals transparently.

5. How does USU relate to WSI and other metrics?

USU is the underlying unit; the World Suffering Index (WSI) is one applied project that uses USU to describe country‑level suffering, alongside simple death counts (and, in future, years of life lost).

USU is intended to sit alongside, not replace, existing measures such as DALYs, QALYs, HDI, or economic indices. DALYs and QALYs track time lived with disability and time lost to early death; USU focuses specifically on experienced suffering (including non‑health harms such as displacement, fear, grief, and some forms of violence).

6. Where can I find a more detailed methods FAQ?

For a longer methods‑focused FAQ that covers both USU and the World Suffering Index (WSI), please see:

World Suffering Index – Methods FAQ

That page goes into more depth on topics such as overlap rules, the USU Catalogue of states, psychological suffering, and how USU is used in country‑level reporting.

Use & citation

The USU framework and worked examples are intended to be reused. You are welcome to apply USU to your own datasets, adapt the catalogue of states, and publish USU‑based indices or WSI‑style analyses, provided you give appropriate credit.

Please cite the methods paper as follows:

Denis Mikhaylov. Universal Suffering Units (USU): A calibrated additive unit of experienced suffering. Preprints.org, 2025. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202511.1315.v1 .

The Supplementary File on the preprint page contains the anchor definitions, calibration summary, minimal input template, and all CSVs used in the worked examples, so that others can replicate and adapt the calculations.

The term World Suffering Index (WSI) is used for the index series published at worldsufferingindex.org. If you publish independent work based on USU, please describe it as “USU‑based” or “WSI‑style” rather than as an official WSI edition.

Contact

USU and the World Suffering Index (WSI) are developed by an independent researcher based in California. For collaboration, comments, or technical questions, please write to research@sufferingunits.org.